Any scientific research can have a huge impact on society, and that is why it needs to undergo quality control. Before publication, peer review helps check how suitable and valid research is. Also, a fresh set of eyes can point out errors, inconsistencies and even add up ideas that can make your work better. Bentham open advises scholars not to skip this process before submitting articles for publication. Here are some reasons why peer review is important.
Allows For A Diversity of Opinion
You have heard that two or multiple heads are better than one. Peer review allows different opinions, ensuring there is no personal bias in an article. It is also a chance to see that other people have great ideas as well. Some people will give you better ideas, while others will top up on your writing points, making it great.
Rectify Vague Terms
Sometimes, even when using an online dictionary to find the right terms to express your ideas, those terms may be unclear or inappropriate. Feedback from peers can help point out which words these are and better alternatives. Vague terms tend to make research articles less desirable to readers as they do not understand the message. A fresh set of eyes will help you prevent this.
Ensures You Have Solid Arguments
Sometimes one can raise arguments based on wrong assumptions. It happens, and most scientists have experienced this. However, when an assumption is false, essentially everything you have written is considered wrong as well. The outcome is based on the fact that if your argument is faulty, then anything after that is unreliable. As noted by Bentham Science Open, with peer review, this is something that can be avoided. They will inform you of wrong arguments, which you can adjust before presenting your work for publication.
Get Feedback on Whether You Have Communicated Effectively
No matter how interesting your research is, if you fail to pass the message well, then it is of no use. Even when making a presentation, you can see whether the group is following your thought process. If it takes longer than usual to get feedback on your manual, you have failed to communicate effectively. So the next thing you will get are questions asking for clarification on specific points. This can help you go back to your paper and see how you can improve the way you have communicated.
During a peer review session, take suggestions and criticism graciously. This is a chance to improve your research for something better.